Archive for September, 2008

Early Season Pheasants

September 29, 2008

The following is a “pass along” article from the Pointing Dog Journal.

Pass Along PDJ
September 2008

Early Season Pheasants
by Steve Smith

Early season pheasants are not quite the challenge that the late-season survivors are. But there’s nothing in their DNA that makes them easy. There used to be an old factoid floating around that most of the pheasants shot in a season were shot on the first day, and most in the first hour of the first day. I always figured that maybe that had as much to do with the crowds in the fields as it did with young birds getting caught flat-footed.

Early season pheasants — on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being those old veterans that survive the weather and the hunting pressure and 1 being barnyard chickens still — rank a 6, an 8 if the hatch was bad and most of what you’re hunting are last year’s survivors.

But there are enough young birds and birds that have not seen a hunter or dog to put thousands in the bag on opening day. If there is a time when you can hunt wild roosters and expect that your dog — pointing breed or flushing dog — can handle them, it’s the first few hours of the first day. After that, things get tough(er).

Speaking of tough, though the birds aren’t feathered out and fattened up yet, they are still tough to kill. But it’s possible to hunt them with something other than a 12-gauge with highway flares for ammo. I like a 16-gauge heavy enough to handle a stout load of an ounce or more of Number 5s. In most cases, if you use enough choke and a good-size shot, 6s being the most popular, and your dog’s a good one, an ounce or 1-1/8 ounces is enough. Later on, almost everyone shoots 1-1/4-ounce loads, and some hunters go heavier than.

No birds, lots of wildlife

September 28, 2008

One of the reasons I enjoy hunting on weekdays is because there are usually not many other hunters, which means that there is more wildlife out and about. So Friday morning, I took Sophie and Dakota back out onto the lava flows where we hunted on the opening day of sage hen and partridge season.

We hunted until about 11:00 am but it was becoming a little too hot for the dogs and the rough lava rock was starting to bother their feet. Their feet were becoming a little tender and I didn’t want to put them in a position where their callouses would start tearing or their feet were going to get cut up.

They did a good job of avoiding cactus, but I still had to pull thorns out of the top of their feet where they brushed over the cactus. And although I have a Chilly Dog cooling vest, it didn’t work too well swapping it from one dog to another, so by this time next year I’ll have one for each dog. I’ll have boots for them as well, since this is rough country.

It wasn’t a total loss, however. We flushed 3 coyotes and a spiked bull elk, and although I had the PI Cam Stick and digital camera, the video and photos didn’t show them good enough to publish. Surprisingly, I have yet to run across any snakes out there in the lavas.

Friday was the last day of sage hen season for this area, but next week is the opening of waterfowl season. If I’m able to get some good waterfowl information from the Fish and Game department, I’ll post a forecast for the upcoming season.

Politics Part 2 of 2

September 26, 2008

Below are the Democratic and Republican candidates and their positions on gun control and the environment.

Barack Obama:
Endorsing Organizations:
Humane USA PAC
Illinois Planned Parenthood Council
Illinois Sierra Club
Sierra Club

Stance on Gun Control:
Ok for states and cities to determine local gun laws. (Apr 2008)
FactCheck: Yes, Obama endorsed Illinois handgun ban. (Apr 2008)
Respect 2nd Amendment, but local gun bans ok. (Feb 2008)
Provide some common-sense enforcement on gun licensing. (Jan 2008)
2000: cosponsored bill to limit purchases to 1 gun per month. (Oct 2007)
Concealed carry OK for retired police officers. (Aug 2007)
Stop unscrupulous gun dealers dumping guns in cities. (Jul 2007)
Keep guns out of inner cities–but also problem of morality. (Oct 2006)
Bush erred in failing to renew assault weapons ban. (Oct 2004)
Ban semi-automatics, and more possession restrictions. (Jul 1998)
Voted NO on prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers. (Jul 2005)

Stance on the Environment:
Willing to suspend ethanol subsidy to keep food prices down. (May 2008)
Genesis teaches stewardship of earth: sacrifice for future. (Apr 2008)
Regulate animal feeding operations for pollution. (Feb 2008)
Will end the notion of Yucca Mountain nuclear storage. (Jan 2008)
Promote green technologies and fuel efficiency standards. (Dec 2007)
Organized inner-city recycling; fought environmental racism. (Oct 2007)
Reduce mercury and lead to protect community health. (Aug 2007)
Protect the Great Lakes and our National Parks and Forests. (Aug 2007)
1985: Organized asbestos removal in Chicago housing project. (Aug 2007)
Passed lead abatement and 24 other laws in IL Senate. (Aug 2007)
Give Katrina contracts to locals, not to Halliburton. (Jun 2007)
Health Care for Hybrids proposal for fuel efficiency. (Mar 2007)
Scored 60% on Humane Society Scorecard on animal protection. (Jan 2007)
Three months working on minority students recycling. (Aug 1996)
Voted YES on including oil and gas smokestacks in mercury regulations. (Sep 2005)
Tax credit to remove lead-based housepaint. (Nov 2005)
Establish commission to examine Katrina response. (Sep 2005)
Sponsored health impact bill for environmental health. (Apr 2006)
Strengthen prohibitions against animal fighting. (Jan 2007)

Joe Biden:
Endorsing Organizations:
None noted by OnTheIssues.org

Stance on Gun Control:
Keep assault weapons ban; close gun show loophole. (Apr 2007)
Voted NO on prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers. (Jul 2005)
Voted NO on banning lawsuits against gun manufacturers for gun violence. (Mar 2004)
Voted YES on background checks at gun shows. (May 1999)
Voted NO on more penalties for gun and drug violations. (May 1999)
Voted NO on loosening license and background checks at gun shows. (May 1999)
Voted NO on maintaining current law: guns sold without trigger locks. (Jul 1998)
Rated F by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record. (Dec 2003)

Stance on the Environment:
America should guarantee Katrina reconstruction. (Jun 2007)
Take away the billions of subsidy to the oil companies. (Jun 2007)
Scored 80% on Humane Society Scorecard on animal protection. (Jan 2007)
Voted YES on including oil and gas smokestacks in mercury regulations. (Sep 2005)
Voted NO on confirming Gale Norton as Secretary of Interior. (Jan 2001)
Voted NO on more funding for forest roads and fish habitat. (Sep 1999)
Voted YES on transportation demo projects. (Mar 1998)
Voted YES on reducing funds for road-building in National Forests. (Sep 1997)
Voted YES on continuing desert protection in California. (Oct 1994)
Voted YES on requiring EPA risk assessments. (May 1994)
End commercial whaling and illegal trade in whale meat. (Jun 2001)
Rated 95% by the LCV, indicating pro-environment votes. (Dec 2003)
EPA must do better on mercury clean-up. (Apr 2004)
Strengthen prohibitions against animal fighting. (Jan 2007)

John McCain:
Endorsing Organizations:
Humane USA PAC
Sportsmen and Animal Owner’s Voting Alliance

Stance on Gun Control:
I know how to use guns; but I don’t own one. (Nov 2007)
Prosecute criminals, not citizens for gun ownership. (Sep 2007)
Don’t hold gun manufacturers liable for crimes. (Sep 2007)
Opposes restrictions on assault weapons and ammunition types. (Sep 2007)
Calls for GOP “tolerance” of closing gun show loopholes. (May 2002)
Ban cheap guns; require safety locks; for gun show checks. (Aug 1999)
Supports ban on certain assault weapons. (Aug 1999)
Voted against Brady Bill and assault weapon ban. (Aug 1999)
Guns are a problem, but so are violent web sites and videos. (Aug 1999)
Punish criminals who abuse 2nd Amendment rights. (May 1999)
Youth Violence Prevention Act restricts guns for kids. (May 1999)
Repeal existing gun restrictions; penalize criminal use. (Jul 1998)
Voted YES on prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers. (Jul 2005)
Voted YES on banning lawsuits against gun manufacturers for gun violence. (Mar 2004)
Voted NO on background checks at gun shows. (May 1999)
Voted YES on more penalties for gun and drug violations. (May 1999)
Voted YES on loosening license and background checks at gun shows. (May 1999)
Voted YES on maintaining current law: guns sold without trigger locks. (Jul 1998)
Ban gun registration and trigger lock law in Washington DC. (Mar 2007)
Allow firearms in National Parks. (Feb 2008)

Stance on the Environment:
GovWatch: Voted for one Congressional Katrina investigation. (Jun 2008)
Support much tougher regulations on emission requirements. (Jan 2008)
FactCheck: Criticized $3M “bear DNA” study, but voted for it. (Nov 2007)
Economic and environmental interests not mutually exclusive. (Sep 2007)
Scored 40% on Humane Society Scorecard on animal protection. (Jan 2007)
1996: Put 3.5B acres of land into wilderness protection. (Jan 2004)
Preserving wilderness among proudest achievements. (Sep 2002)
Preserve and help our National Parks. (Jan 2000)
Repeal ban on new roads in wilderness due to bad process. (Dec 1999)
Use park visitor fees for park development bonds. (Dec 1999)
Preserve natural resources for future. (Jul 1999)
Voted YES on including oil and gas smokestacks in mercury regulations. (Sep 2005)
Voted YES on confirming Gale Norton as Secretary of Interior. (Jan 2001)
Voted YES on transportation demo projects. (Mar 1998)
Voted NO on reducing funds for road-building in National Forests. (Sep 1997)
Voted NO on continuing desert protection in California. (Oct 1994)
Voted YES on requiring EPA risk assessments. (May 1994)
End commercial whaling and illegal trade in whale meat. (Jun 2001)
Supports grants for brownfields remediation. (May 2002)
Make EPA into a Cabinet department. (May 2002)
Rated 53% by the LCV, indicating a mixed record on environment. (Dec 2003)
EPA must do better on mercury clean-up. (Apr 2004)
Focus on results, not regulation. (Sep 1998)

Sarah Palin:
Endorsing Organizations:
None noted by OnTheIssues.org

Stance on Gun Control:
Hunts and fishes, as did her father. (Aug 2008)
Hunts as much as she can; freezer-full of wild game. (Aug 2008)
Supports ending D.C.’s 32-year-old ban on handguns. (Jun 2008)
Lifelong NRA member and champion of right to bear arms. (Feb 2008)
Supports Constitutional right to bear arms. (Nov 2006)

Stance on the Environment:
Opposed protections for salmon from mining contamination. (Aug 2008)
Sue US government to stop listing polar bear as endangered. (Aug 2008)
We must encourage timber, mining, drilling, and fishing. (Jan 2008)
Wolf predator control is important for subsistence hunters. (Sep 2007)
Feds shouldn’t list beluga whales as endangered. (Aug 2007)
Provide stability in regulations for developers. (Jan 2007)
Convince the rest of the nation to open ANWR. (Jan 2007)
Fish platform: “Resource First” philosophy. (Nov 2006)
Rail provides critical link for business development. (Nov 2006)
Supports “Roads to Resources”: subsidized access to mines. (Oct 2006)
Don’t duplicate effort in monitoring cruise ship emissions. (Oct 2006)
Don’t amend AK constitution for rural subsistence fishing. (Oct 2006)

Copyright 2008 The Speakout Foundation and OnTheIssues.org

Politics Part 1 of 2

September 25, 2008

Regardless of what you think about politics and politicians, essentially every aspect of our lives are affected by them. Part 1 of my “politics” series are my observations and part 2 are the “facts”, if you will.

First, the voter (and non-voter) need to accept some of the blame for the mess that Washington is in – after all, we’re the ones responsible for putting them in office and keeping them there. We, the voter, are the politicians’ boss and we are the ones who hired them; we are therefore the ones who should fire them for poor performance, and replace them with someone who will do a better job. It’s no different than hiring a known swindler to work for you and then being surprised and upset when that same swindler steals from you to the point that it runs your business into the ground.

The problem most voters face is not knowing who or what to believe. A couple of guidelines I use are: 1- how do they actually vote on the issues, and 2- what kind of integrity and character do they exhibit in their campaigns.

1- Politicians can run from, hide from, and distort just about everything except their voting record; a politician’s voting record is a testimony of their values and beliefs. Regardless of what political ads say, the best way of knowing what a politician will do in the future is to study what they have done in the past. To access a politician’s actual voting record, go to VoteSmart.org.

2- If you think that a candidate who runs a dirty campaign, refuses to acknowledge or accept responsibility for their past actions (both political and personal), and has shown a general lack of integrity, will suddenly turn into an honest and straightforward representative when they are elected, think again. Our congress and senate are filled with politicians who have proven otherwise. Not only are you paying their salaries, but you are paying for their waste, fraud and abuse as well.

I’m not officially endorsing one candidate or another although my mind is solidly made up for whom I will vote; it’s up to you to do your own research, weigh the issues, and make your own decision.

Since my blog deals primarily with bird dogs, and secondarily with guns, hunting and the outdoors, I’ve included several links that I thought might be relevent. In my next post on politics, I will publish the official position that each of the Democratic and Republican candidates have on guns and the environment.

I’m not going to publish the positions of the other candidates, because it’s a given that either a Democrat or Republican will be moving into the White House and I don’t want to drag this topic out like some political blog. However I strongly encourage you to spend time educating yourself on these lesser party candidates, your own representatives, and the issues.

National Rifle Association
Buckeye firearms association
Us sportsman alliance
Ontheissues.org
VoteSmart.org

Waterfowl Survey Mixed – Ducks are down, fuel is up

September 23, 2008

The following is a “pass along” article from the Retriever Journal.

Pass Along RJ
September 08

Waterfowl Survey Mixed
Ducks are down, fuel is up
by Doug Larsen

Each year, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in conjunction with state agencies, conducts the Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey, generally known as the breeding survey and/or the “pond counts.” While it may sound rather simplistic, it’s the most extensive waterfowl survey in the world, and it samples over 2 million square miles across the north-central U.S. and all across Canada and Alaska.

Despite what you might read on Internet duck-hunting forums, the USFWS study is an exacting one. I think it is important that before we begin, we all know that this is not just two biology students rambling around the prairies in a rusty Suburban, but an all-out duck-counting assault each year conducted by many, many people well-qualified to do so. While this survey is conducted in May and into early June, the results are not usually published until July, and it is the findings of this survey that are processed via the Adaptive Harvest Management model to determine how the duck seasons will be structured for the fall.

There is both good news and bad news. Since I’ve always been someone who likes to get the cauliflower off the plate before I eat my steak, the bad news first. Despite good to great water conditions in eastern Canada and across most of Alberta, it is quite dry in some of the most important parts of the breeding regions of the U.S. and Canada (the Dakotas and Saskatchewan), and the pond counts are down. The USFWS counted 4.4 million ponds, which is 37 percent lower than in 2007 when they counted 7 million ponds.

As you’d expect, when the pond count is down, so are the ducks. Overall, there are just over 37 million ducks, about 4 million fewer than in 2007, a 9 percent decrease in sheer numbers, but still 11 percent above the long-term average. Mallards, by far the most popular and important species of duck from an overall hunting standpoint, are down only 7 percent, which is something of a surprise, given the low pond counts. Last year there were 8.3 million mallards, and this year there are 7.7 million breeding mallards according to the survey.

Other species that did some backsliding are gadwalls, which are down 19 percent from last year; shovelers (-23 percent); and pintails (-22 percent). While gadwalls and shovelers are both 56 percent above their long-term averages, pintails continue to be a concern, still down more than 35 percent long term. Continued habitat loss keeps chipping away at the pintail.

Wigeon are down 11 percent from last year and 5 percent long term, while blue-winged teal fell just 1 percent since 2007. By far the most frightening loss came in the canvasback column, which fell off by 44 percent from 2007. There are now fewer than 500,000 canvasbacks, and they continue to perform 14 percent below the long-term averages.

Okay, so now that we have gotten all the vegetables off our plate, let’s turn to brighter news. Three species were up in the 2008 count: Green winged teal are up 3 percent over 2007; scaup, or bluebills, are up 8 percent; and redheads are up 5 percent this year. While the green-wings are still doing very well, at 57 percent above long-term averages and redheads even better at 66 percent above the long term, bluebills are still 27 percent off the long-term average; however, bluebills are now the third most abundant duck.

This “Waterfowling North America” column appears in the upcoming October/November 2008 issue of The Retriever Journal. If you are a subscriber, stay tuned! The issue is printed and about to be mailed!

Rained-out opening

September 21, 2008

Sage hen and partridge season opened yesterday but for some, it was a rained-out event. I started out early and hunted the edge of a lava flow; I normally hunted about 50 miles southwest of this area but wanted to try something closer to home.

There were a few other hunters in the area and several had camped there the previous night. Thunderstorms were moving through south of us as, close enough to hear the thunder. A flock of Chuckars flushed several hundred feet away and but were up and over a lava ridge within a couple of seconds. I knew they wouldn’t go far, so we went after them.

They flushed again, but again it would have been a long shot and they were up and over another ridge in a couple of seconds. We hunted them for awhile but never did see them again. There was a little scattered shooting from some of the other hunters, but those would be the only birds we would see that day.

I drove north and we hunted another area, but the thunderstorms were spreading and getting too close for comfort. A light rain was falling by the time we made it back to the Jeep and I didn’t want to be caught out in the desert during a lightening storm.

I continued on and about 60 miles later was hunting west of Dubois. We began hunting some good-looking country until a steady rain set in. Not being familiar with the country, I didn’t know what the roads would be like and I wasn’t going to push my luck. We returned to the Jeep and after a couple of peanut butter sandwiches that I shared with Sophie and Dakota, called it a day.

I asked the officer at the Fish and Game checkpoint how hunting had been, and he informed me that hunters had either been skunked like me, or everyone limited out – there was nothing in between.

On the way home, a severe thunderstorm warning came across the radio for several counties so I imagine that there was a lot of disrupted hunting.

Dakota and Sophie hunting lava flow, 9-20-8

Dakota and Sophie hunting lava flow, 9-20-8


Crevasses and lava tubes are just a couple of the dangers in hunting lavas.
Lava tube while hunting 9-20-8

Lava tube while hunting 9-20-8

Do You Have a “System”?

September 18, 2008

Below is a “Pass Along” article from Just Labs magazine.

Pass Along JL
September 08

Do You Have a “System”?
by Jason Smith

What is your training “system”? Do you have a set method, perhaps outlined by a book or a video, that tells you step-by-step how to train your Lab? Did you attend a puppy kindergarten and receive training materials and are convinced that this is the way to train a dog?

While training systems are, for the most part, fairly similar in helping you get your Lab from pup to good citizenship, there are variations… just as there are variations in Labs. Strict adherence to a set “system” without taking into consideration the individuality of each dog is a recipe for failure. I’m not saying you have to ditch the whole system, but you’ll find that depending on the type of puppy you have, you will probably have to make regular adjustments to your training methods.

We published an article this past summer, in our July/August issue, about how to communicate with a dog that has a “bold” disposition; in our November/December issue, we look at the other end of the spectrum, helping you deal with the “timid” Lab. In each litter, there will be bold dogs, timid dogs, and those with personalities right down the middle. And in each case, the same training system, with the same steps, with the same sorts of praise and discipline, will not work with each pup.

As the thinking, reasoning, human part of the relationship between you and your Lab, it is up to you to be able to recognize your Lab’s personality and which type of training your Lab responds to the best. Know that just because you could be sharp and forceful with a high-strung pup out of field trial lines the first time, doesn’t mean that the same exact system will work on the next pup you picked up out of a litter that has produced good guide dogs.

We ask pups to adjust to our lifestyle when we bring them into our homes. The least we can do is adjust how we train based on careful observations of the individuality of the puppy. What works for one, doesn’t work for all.

Sesame Ginger Grouse

September 16, 2008

While playing bachelor last weekend, I defrosted and cooked up the Ruffed Grouse that I shot a couple of weeks ago. If you’re stuck for a recipe, you usually can’t go wrong by marinating your bird in salad dressing; while the recipe won’t win any awards, it wasn’t too bad.

We had about ½ cup of Paul Newman’s Sesame Seed and Ginger salad dressing that I marinated the grouse in. I covered and baked it in the same marinade, but first added several dashes of teriyaki sauce for good measure.

Some homemade macaroni salad was the only side dish I had available without going to too much work, and while it was an excellent salad, an oriental side dish or dipping sauce might have been a better option.

Scouting new country

September 14, 2008

My wife was visiting one of our daughters in college, so I decided it was a good time to take the dogs and look for some new grouse hunting areas. While it did not turn out as I planned, I did find a couple of new areas for hunting partridge and sage hen when the season opens.

We started out early Friday morning and I was originally planning on spending the entire weekend hunting and fishing; my parents own a lot with a trailer on it where I would stay. My first task was to cut down all the grass on the property, which was dry and becoming a fire danger. I was done by noon and after a bologna sandwich and chips, headed out with the dogs.

The area I wanted to check out was north of Fairfield and my first stop looked like a good hunting area, however I didn’t try to hunt. From the looks of the vehicles and tents in the campground and trailhead, I figured that it was occupied by the Gucci crowd and didn’t want to bother them with any shooting.

We hunted a growth of aspens at our second stop but cattle had recently been through, so we continued on. The country looked promising for grouse but it also looked like country that a person would need to learn how to hunt, not country that you could hike around in for a couple of hours and get a bird or two. The road that I really wanted to take was closed due to fire danger, so back to the trailer we went.

My other goal was to do some fishing. The canal company cut off the water and the Fish and Game Department had opened the canal up to salvage fishing. This didn’t work out because the canal company informs Fish and Game on the day they cut off the water. By the time I got there which was a week later, all that was left were a few pools of water and lots of dead fish; some of the larger pools still had life fish in them but I was really no longer in the mood.

So I packed up and came home Friday evening. I took a couple of desert roads on the way back and found several areas that look promising for sage hen and partridge; with season opening next weekend, I’ll give them a try.

JDLR

September 12, 2008

I posted an article some time back on hunters and fishermen policing ourselves by reporting poachers, those who shoot protected species, and so forth. Not only is it the right thing to do but it keeps us, as sportsmen, from being viewed in the same light as these criminals.

A couple of weeks ago, I went grouse hunting in Wolverine Canyon where there is a cooperative effort between ranchers and sportsmen. Some ranchers have posted their property with an “Access Yes” sign, and if you follow their posted restrictions such as no motorized vehicles or timber cutting, you can access their property to hunt, hike, fish, and so forth.

That may be in jeopardy now because someone or some people have been shooting and killing horses and cattle in this area. These people are not sportsmen and they are not hunters – they are criminals with guns and should be treated as such. I personally have no tolerance for poachers and criminals such as these and as a sportsman, you shouldn’t either.

Allowing these kind of people to continue their activities will justify closing off more lands to sportsmen, more restrictions and more criticism. While mistakes can be made while hunting, such as accidentally shooting the wrong species or sex, willfully breaking the law is unacceptable.

People like this are not sportsmen but criminals and there should be no hesitation in reporting them. We have a saying that our sector of industry has adopted: JDLR. “Just Don’t Look Right”. So while you are out hunting or fishing and see something that Just Don’t Look Right, report it – you’ll generally be right.